Credit unions.
Summary
Existing law, the California Credit Union Law, provides for the regulation and certification of credit unions by the Commissioner of Financial Institutions. Existing law regulates loans to officials of a credit union and defines an official as a director, officer, or member of the supervisory committee or the credit committee of a credit union. Existing law prohibits a credit union from entering into any obligation with an official of the credit union, directly or indirectly, not fully secured by shares or certificates for funds unless specified requirements are satisfied. Existing law makes it a crime for specified employees of a credit union to knowingly permit, or participate in, the creation of an obligation that is not in conformity with the requirements of the Credit Union Law, except as specified. This bill would revise these requirements in order for a credit union to enter into an obligation, as defined, with an official of the credit union, directly or indirectly. The bill would, among other things, in order for a credit union to be authorized to enter into these obligations with an official, prohibit the aggregate amount of obligations outstanding to all officials, except obligations fully secured by shares, from exceeding 20% of the aggregate dollar amount of all savings capital of the credit union and would require that any obligation which would cause the aggregate amount of obligations outstanding to the official to exceed $50,000, excluding any portion fully secured by shares, be approved by the credit committee or credit manager, and by the board of directors of the credit union. Because knowingly creating or participating in the creation of an obligation in violation of these provisions by an employee of a credit union would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Sep 26, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2011 · Assembly Sep 2, 2011
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 30, 2011
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Sep 26, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
Sep 2, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2847.).
lower
Aug 31, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 30, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
May 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 11).
lower
May 3, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Katcho Achadjian
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1076
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1076. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline