Ballot measures: fiscal analysis.
Summary
Existing law directs the Attorney General, in preparing a circulating title and summary for a proposed ballot initiative, to include an estimate of the amount of increase or decrease of revenues or costs to the state. Existing law requires the Department of Finance and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee to jointly make and deliver such an estimate to the Attorney General so that he or she may include it in the circulating title and summary. This bill would, based on the fiscal analysis by the Department of Finance and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, that a measure which would establish a new or expanded program costing more than $1,000,000 in any year without providing new revenues or eliminating existing programs to offset those costs, require that specified language be provided to the Attorney General which may be included in the circulating title and summary advising that the proposed initiative does not include sufficient funding to pay the cost of the measure. Existing law directs the Legislative Analyst to prepare an unbiased fiscal analysis of a measure that is included in the ballot pamphlet stating whether the measure would result in increased or decreased costs to the state and an estimate of those costs or savings. This bill also would require, if a fiscal analysis by the Legislative Analyst determines that a measure would establish a new or expanded program costing more than $1,000,000 in any year without providing new revenues or eliminating existing programs to offset those costs, that specified language be added to the ballot pamphlet advising that the proposed measure does not include sufficient funding to pay the cost of the measure. This bill would also make technical changes to conform provisions of the Political Reform Act of 1974 and parallel provisions in the Elections Code relating to the ballot pamphlet. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, generally provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. The act also provides that, notwithstanding this requirement, the Legislature may amend specified provisions to add to the ballot pamphlet information regarding candidates or other information by a majority vote. This bill would find and declare that it would permit or require additional information to be included in the ballot pamphlet. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 9087 of the Elections Code and Section 88003 of the Government Code, proposed by AB 732, to be operative only if AB 732 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Vetoed Oct 8, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly May 27, 2011
How they voted
22–10
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Sep 7, 2011
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Oct 8, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 24. Page 3083.).
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-10-3)
senate
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
May 27, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-23-1)
assembly
May 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 18).
lower
May 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 14, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Gordon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1021
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1021. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline