Local government finance: vehicle license fee adjustments: County of Orange.
Summary
The Vehicle License Fee (VLF) Law establishes, in lieu of any ad valorem property tax upon vehicles, an annual license fee for any vehicle subject to registration in this state. Beginning with the 2004–05 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, existing law requires that each city, county, and city and county receive a vehicle license fee adjustment amount (VLFAA) , as defined, from a Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund that exists in each county treasury. This bill would, for the 2011–12 fiscal year, increase the VLFAA for the County of Orange by $48,000,000 and require that this increase be included in the calculation of the vehicle license fee adjustment amount for that county for each year thereafter, so long as certain conditions are met, as specified. By changing the manner in which property tax revenues are allocated by the county officials in the County of Orange, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Orange. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Sep 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Sep 1, 2011
Last action Sep 14, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Sep 10, 2011
How they voted
59–3
Passed · 17 other
Total votes 79
Sep 10, 2011
D
Democratic51
72% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican27
77% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Sep 10, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-3-17)
assembly
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (September 9).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
Jose Solorio
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 43
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 43. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline