High-speed rail.
Summary
Existing law, the California High-Speed Train Act, creates the High-Speed Rail Authority to develop and implement a high-speed train system in the state, with specified powers and duties. Existing law, the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century, approved by the voters as Proposition 1A at the November 4, 2008, general election, provides for the issuance of $9.95 billion in general obligation bonds for high-speed rail and related purposes. This bill, subject to appropriation by the Legislature, would require the authority to expend federal funds made available by the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) for specified high-speed rail purposes. The bill would require the authority to take various actions in that regard. The bill would also require the authority to submit to the Legislature and the Legislative Analyst an expenditure plan for the federal funds within 60 days of finalization of a cooperative agreement with the federal government. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations relative to federal funds to be made available to the state by ARRA for high-speed rail purposes. The bill would exempt the Transbay Transit Center project in San Francisco from these provisions. This bill would provide that it shall become operative only if A.B. 289 is also enacted.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Apr 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 5, 2010
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Apr 29, 2010 · Assembly Aug 26, 2010
How they voted
24–7
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 34
Apr 29, 2010
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican11
63% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 24. Noes 11. Page 5069.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 26, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-11-4)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 28.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 14, 2010
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 29, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-7-3)
senate
Apr 26, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 3334.)
upper
Apr 14, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3186.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 5, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 965
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 965. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline