Prisoners: adjudication of parental rights: participation.
Summary
Existing law requires notice of, and the opportunity for an incarcerated parent to be physically present in, proceedings terminating his or her parental rights or seeking to adjudicate the child of a prisoner a dependent child of the court. These proceedings may not be adjudicated without the physical presence of the parent unless the court receives a knowing waiver from the parent of his or her right to be physically present at the proceedings, or an affidavit signed by a person in charge of the incarcerating institution that the prisoner does not intend to appear at the proceeding. Existing law provides that, for all other kinds of actions not specified above in which an incarcerated parent's legal rights are adjudicated, the court may order the physical presence of the parent at the proceeding. This bill would provide that an incarcerated parent who has either waived the right to be physically present at the proceeding or who has not been ordered by the court to be present at the proceeding may be given the opportunity, at the discretion of the court, to participate in the proceeding by videoconference or teleconference, if that technology is available, as long as the parent's participation otherwise complies with the law. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to preserve internal job placement opportunities and earned privileges of prisoners, and to prevent the removal of prisoners from court-ordered courses, as a result of participation in child dependency proceedings. This bill would permit the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to accept donated materials and services related to videoconferencing and teleconferencing in order to implement a program, at a prison to be determined by the department, to facilitate the participation of incarcerated parents in dependency court hearings. The bill would specify that the implementation of the program is contingent upon the receipt of sufficient donations of materials and services by the department.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 5, 2010
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2010 · Assembly Aug 12, 2010
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 38
Aug 19, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-3)
senate
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4646.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 12, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0-1)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 4, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3427.)
upper
Apr 20, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 19, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3184.)
upper
Mar 23, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3003.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 5, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 962
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 962. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline