Debit cards: service fees.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a retailer from imposing a surcharge on a credit cardholder who elects to use a credit card instead of paying by cash, check or similar means, as provided. Existing law also provides that any retailer who imposes a surcharge and who fails to pay that amount to the cardholder within 30 days of written demand is liable for 3 times the amount at which actual damages are assessed. The cardholder is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in the action. Existing law exempts from these provisions charges for payment made to an electrical, gas, or water corporation. Existing law also regulates the use of debit cards, as defined. This bill would make these provisions applicable to a retailer in any sales, service, or lease transaction with a consumer who elects to use a debit card instead of paying by cash, check, or similar means. This bill would also include a prepaid card or other means of access to prepaid funds, as provided, in the definition of debit card.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 2, 2010
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2010 · Assembly Aug 12, 2010
How they voted
20–7
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 34
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic23
78% Yea
R
Republican11
36% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
3
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 12, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-19-7)
assembly
Aug 12, 2010
Introduced
Amendments by Assembly Member Adams tabled on motion by Assembly Member Calderon . (Ayes 42. Noes 34. Page 6171.)
lower
Aug 12, 2010
Introduced
Amendments by Assembly Member Tran tabled on motion of Assembly Member Calderon. (Ayes 46. Noes 27. Page 6170.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.)
lower
Jun 3, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-7-7)
senate
Apr 29, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 3403.)
upper
Feb 2, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 933
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 933. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline