Mortgages: deficiency judgments.
Summary
Existing law authorizes an action for a deficiency judgment for the balance due upon an obligation for the payment of which a deed of trust or mortgage with power of sale upon real property or any interest therein was given as security, as specified. Existing law prohibits a deficiency judgment in any case in which the real property or an estate for years therein has been sold by the mortgagee or trustee under power of sale contained in the mortgage or deed of trust. This bill would prohibit a deficiency judgment under a note secured by a first deed of trust or first mortgage for a dwelling of not more than 4 units in any case in which the trustor or mortgagor sells the dwelling for less than the remaining amount of the indebtedness due at the time of sale with the written consent of the holder of the first deed of trust or first mortgage. The bill would provide that written consent of the holder of the first deed of trust or first mortgage to that sale shall obligate that holder to accept the sale proceeds as full payment and to fully discharge the remaining amount of the indebtedness on the first deed of trust or first mortgage. The bill would specify that those provisions would not limit the ability of the holder of the first deed of trust or first mortgage to seek damages and use existing rights and remedies against the trustor or mortgagor or any 3rd party for fraud or waste if the trustor or mortgagor commits either fraud with respect to the sale of, or waste with respect to, the real property that secures that deed of trust or mortgage. The bill would make these provisions inapplicable if the trustor or mortgagor is a corporation or political subdivision of the state.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 2, 2010
Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 10, 2010 · Assembly Aug 16, 2010
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 38
May 10, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4659.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-6)
assembly
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 21.)
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 10, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-7)
senate
May 5, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 3. Page 3443.)
upper
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 2, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Denise Moreno Ducheny
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 931
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 931. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline