Marriage.
Summary
Existing law defines marriage as a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between a man and a woman, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary. This bill would instead define the term civil marriage as a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between a man and a woman, established pursuant to a State of California marriage license issued by the county clerk, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary. The bill would also make conforming related changes by changing certain references to marriage to civil marriage. Existing law enumerates persons who are authorized to solemnize a marriage, including, but not limited to, any priest, minister, rabbi, or authorized person of any religious denomination. The bill would specify that no priest, minister, rabbi, or authorized person of any religious denomination, or his or her religious denomination, would be required to solemnize a marriage that is contrary to the tenets of his, her, or its faith. The bill would state that any refusal to solemnize a marriage under that provision shall not affect the tax exempt status of any entity.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Jan 27, 2010
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2010 · Assembly Aug 19, 2010
How they voted
23–10
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
May 27, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 4883.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 19, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-24-2)
assembly
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.)
lower
May 27, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-10-4)
senate
Mar 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3001.)
upper
Jan 27, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 906
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 906. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline