Care facilities.
Summary
Existing law, the California Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Act, provides for the licensure of residential care facilities by the department. Existing law requires a criminal record check of applicants for a license, special permit, or certificate of approval to operate a residential care facility for the elderly, or for other persons, including nonclients who reside in those facilities and staff and employees. Existing law requires that an application be denied if it is found that the applicant or any of the other designated persons has been convicted of a crime, other than a minor traffic violation. Existing law authorizes the Director of Social Services to grant an exemption from disqualification under these provisions, but prohibits the director from granting an exemption in the case of certain crimes. This bill would add additional specified crimes with respect to which the director is prohibited from granting an exemption. This bill would also add specified crimes with respect to which the director is prohibited from granting an exemption within 10 years of either the date the person was convicted of the offense or the date the person was released from incarceration for the offense, whichever is later.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 25, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 17, 2010
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 38
May 17, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 16, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 17, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-5)
senate
May 11, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 27, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 26, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3308.)
upper
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jan 25, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
EA
Elaine Alquist
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 892
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 892. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline