Health care coverage.
Summary
Existing law, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, on and after January 1, 2014, requires a health insurance issuer offering health insurance coverage in the individual or group market to accept every employer and individual in the state that applies for that coverage, as specified, and requires issuers in the individual and small group markets to ensure that the coverage includes a specified essential benefits package. The act requires an essential health benefits package to provide coverage in one of 5 levels based on actuarial value, as specified. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law imposes various requirements with respect to individual contracts and policies issued by health care service plans and health insurers. Existing law requires a health care service plan to permit, at least once each year, an individual who has been covered for at least 18 months under an individual plan contract issued by the health care service plan to transfer, without medical underwriting, as defined, to another individual plan contract offered by the health care service plan having equal or lesser benefits, as specified. Existing law imposes a parallel requirement with respect to individual policies issued by health insurers. This bill would eliminate the 18-month requirement and would require plans and insurers to allow an individual to transfer to another individual contract or policy without medical underwriting on the annual renewal date of his or her contract or policy. Commencing July 1, 2011, the bill would require plans and insurers to categorize all products offered in the individual market into 5 tiers according to actuarial value, as specified, and would require plans and insurers to disclose this value and other information in certain disclosure forms. Existing law prohibits a health care service plan from expending for administrative costs, as defined, an excessive amount of the payments the plan receives for providing health care services to its subscribers and enrollees. The Insurance Commissioner is required to withdraw approval of an individual or mass-marketed policy of disability insurance if the commissioner finds that the benefits provided under the policy are unreasonable in relation to the premium charged, as specified. The federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act prohibits a health insurance issuer issuing health insurance coverage from establishing lifetime limits or unreasonable annual limits on the dollar value of benefits for any participant or beneficiary, as specified. The act also requires a health insurance issuer issuing health insurance coverage to provide an annual rebate to each enrollee if the ratio of the amount of the revenue expended by the issuer on costs to the total amount of premium revenue is less than a certain percentage, as specified. This bill would require health care service plans and health insurers to comply with the requirements imposed under those provisions to the extent required under federal law. Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements with respect to health care service plans would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Jan 21, 2010
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2010 · Assembly Aug 30, 2010
How they voted
21–9
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 34
Jun 1, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
57
Key actions
14
Committee
14
Amendments
6
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 11. Page 5077.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 5131.)
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 5056.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-22)
assembly
Aug 30, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 26, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 26.)
lower
Aug 26, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.)
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
(August 24 amended measure version corrected August 25.)
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. On HEALTH pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
(August 20 amended measure version corrected August 25.)
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.)
lower
Jun 1, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-9-4)
senate
May 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3669.)
upper
May 13, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 10, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 27, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 26, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3302.)
upper
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Jan 21, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
EA
Elaine Alquist
DDemocratic
Co
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
Co
HD
Hector De La Torre
DDemocratic
Co
MF
Mike Feuer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 890
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 890. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline