Counties: cities: construction projects: alternative bidding procedures: design-build.
Summary
Existing law authorizes counties to use alternative procedures, known as design-build, for bidding on construction projects in the county in excess of $2,500,000, in accordance with specified procedures. These procedures include a requirement for contracts awarded, as specified, that a county board of supervisors pay a fee into the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, which funds are continuously appropriated for the Department of Industrial Relations' enforcement of prevailing wage requirements on public works projects. Each county that elects to use the design-build method on a public works project is required to submit a report to the Legislative Analyst's Office before December 1, 2009, containing a description of each public works project procured through the design-build process and completed after November 1, 2004, and before November 1, 2009. Existing law also requires the Legislative Analyst, on or before January 1, 2010, to report to the Legislature on the use of the design-build method by counties. This bill would make various changes in the procedures required for the use of design-build by those counties, as specified. The bill would also revise and expand those reporting provisions to require each county electing to use the design-build method on a public works project to submit to the Legislative Analyst's Office before September 1, 2013, a report containing a description, as specified, of each public works project procured through the design-build process and completed after November 1, 2009, and before August 1, 2013. This bill would require the Legislative Analyst, on or before January 1, 2014, to submit a report to the Legislature, as specified. Existing law authorizing design-build contracts for county construction projects repeals these provisions on January 1, 2011. This bill would extend the repeal date until July 1, 2014. By extending the repeal date, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law also authorizes cities, until January 1, 2016, to use alternative procedures, known as design-build, for bidding on construction projects in the city in excess of $1,000,000. These procedures also require a city council to pay a fee into the State Public Works Fund, a continuously appropriated fund for the Department of Industrial Relation's enforcement of prevailing wage requirements on public works projects. This bill would make various changes in the procedures required for the use of design-build by those cities, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Jan 12, 2010
Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2010 · Assembly Aug 18, 2010
How they voted
21–7
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 34
Jun 1, 2010
D
Democratic23
47% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 30. Noes 0. Page 4882.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 18, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-5-9)
assembly
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Lower · Passed
(August 2 amended measure version corrected August 3.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in Committee on June 16.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 1, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-7-6)
senate
May 11, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 3497.)
upper
Apr 26, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3307.)
upper
Apr 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jan 12, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 879
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 879. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline