Public postsecondary education: executive officer compensation.
Summary
Existing law establishes the University of California, which is administered by the Regents of the University of California, the California State University, which is administered by the Trustees of the California State University, and the California Community Colleges, which is administered by the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, as the 3 segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law authorizes the regents, the trustees, and the board to employ officers and other employees. This bill would prohibit the trustees from increasing the monetary compensation, as defined, of, or approving a monetary bonus for, any executive officer, as defined, of the California State University in any fiscal year in which the General Fund appropriation to the California State University in the annual Budget Act is less than, or equal to, the General Fund appropriation to the university in the annual Budget Act for the immediately preceding fiscal year. The bill would request the regents to not increase the monetary compensation of, or approve a monetary bonus for, any executive officer, as defined, of the University of California, in any fiscal year in which the General Fund appropriation to the University of California in the annual Budget Act is less than, or equal to, the General Fund appropriation to the university in the annual Budget Act for the immediately preceding fiscal year.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Senate Passage
Apr 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Jan 20, 2009
Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Apr 16, 2009 · Assembly Sep 8, 2009
How they voted
22–13
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 38
Apr 16, 2009
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
2
Committee
0
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 32. Noes 5. Page 2367.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-1-1)
assembly
Apr 16, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-13-3)
senate
Jan 20, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Leland Yee
DDemocratic
Co
GR
Gloria Romero
DDemocratic
Co
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Co
Robert Dutton
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 86
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 86. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline