Local government finance.
Summary
Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenues to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing property tax law also reduces the amounts of ad valorem property tax revenue that would otherwise be annually allocated to the county, cities, and special districts pursuant to these general allocation requirements by requiring, for purposes of determining property tax revenue allocations in each county for the 1992–93 and 1993–94 fiscal years, that the amounts of property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for allocation to school districts, community college districts, and the county office of education. This bill would, for purposes of property tax revenue allocations for the 2011–12 and 2012–13 fiscal years, require the county auditor for a county for which a negative sum was calculated pursuant to a specified former statute, in reducing the amount of property tax revenue otherwise allocated to the county by an amount attributable to that negative sum, to apply a reduction amount equal to the reduction amount determined for specified fiscal years. This bill would also, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, require the auditor of a qualified county, as defined, to increase the total amount of ad valorem property tax revenue otherwise required to be allocated to that county by the county equity amount, as defined, and to commensurately reduce the total amount of ad valorem property tax revenue otherwise required to be allocated to school entities in the county, as specified. By imposing new duties in the annual allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Feb 2010
Senate Passage
Oct 2009
Assembly Passage
Jan 2010
Signed into Law
Feb 2010
Introduced Jan 20, 2009
Signed Feb 24, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Apr 16, 2009 · Assembly Jan 27, 2010
How they voted
21–12
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Apr 16, 2009
D
Democratic22
95% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
39
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Feb 24, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Feb 11, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 2796.) To enrollment.
upper
Feb 10, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2792.)
upper
Feb 3, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2757.) Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Feb 1, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Jan 27, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-0-6)
assembly
Oct 26, 2009
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on September 10.)
lower
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
lower
Sep 4, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. On APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-12-2)
senate
Jan 20, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DC
Dave Cogdill
RRepublican
Co
Jeff Denham
RRepublican
Co
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Co
MY
Mariko Yamada
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 85
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 85. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline