Recording crimes.
Summary
Existing law provides that a person is guilty of failure to disclose the origin of a recording or audiovisual work if, for commercial advantage or private financial gain, he or she advertises, sells, rents, manufactures, or possesses for those purposes, a recording or audiovisual work that does not disclose the name of the manufacturer, author, artist, performer, or producer, as specified. Failure to disclose the origin of a recording or audiovisual work is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail, imprisonment in the state prison, or a fine, or by both imprisonment and fine, as specified, depending on the number of articles of audio recordings or audiovisual works involved, and whether the offense is a first offense or a 2nd or subsequent offense. Existing law defines "recording" for the purpose of these provisions to mean any tangible medium upon which information or sounds are recorded or otherwise stored, including any phonograph record, disc, tape, audio cassette, wire, film, or other medium on which information or sounds are recorded or stored, but does not include sounds accompanying a motion picture or other visual work. Existing law defines "audiovisual works" as the physical embodiment of works that consist of related images that are intrinsically intended to be shown using machines or devices such as projectors, viewers, or electronic equipment, together with accompanying sounds, if any, regardless of the nature of the material objects such as films or tapes on which the works are embodied. This bill would expand the definition of "recording" for the purposes of the above provisions to expressly include, but not be limited to, a memory card, flash drive, hard drive, or data storage device. This bill would, for purposes of the definition of "audiovisual works," add discs, memory cards, flash drives, hard drives, or data storage devices, or other devices to films and tapes as examples of material objects on which the works may be embodied. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would mandate a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 653w of the Penal Code proposed by AB 819, contingent on the prior enactment of that bill. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Mar 19, 2009
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 27, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 38
Aug 27, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
40
Key actions
10
Committee
15
Amendments
1
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-4)
senate
Aug 27, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4966.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 26, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4955.)
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4858.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-2)
assembly
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 12.)
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on May 28.)
lower
May 28, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES.
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 12, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 28, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 682.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 19, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 830
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 830. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline