SB 827 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

South Coast Air Quality Management District: CEQA: permits.

Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA exempts certain specified projects from its requirements. Under existing law, every air pollution control district or air quality management district in a federal nonattainment area for any national ambient air quality standard is required to establish by regulation, a system by which all reductions in emissions of air contaminants that are to be used to offset certain future increases in the emission of air contaminants are banked prior to use. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (district) promulgated various rules establishing offset exemptions, providing Priority Reserve offset credits, and creating or tracking credits used for offset exemption or Priority Reserve projects. In Natural Resources Defense Council v. South Coast Air Quality Management District (Super. Ct. Los Angeles County, 2007, No. BS 110792) , the superior court found the promulgation of certain of these district rules to be in violation of CEQA. This bill would authorize the district to issue permits under specified circumstances, notwithstanding this court decision. The provisions of the bill would be repealed on May 1, 2012. (2) This bill would state the findings and declarations of the Legislature concerning the need for special legislation.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2009
Committee Review
Sep 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Mar 19, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2009 · Assembly Sep 12, 2009

How they voted

248
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 36
Sep 12, 2009
D Democratic23
11 Yea 8 Nay 4
47% Yea
R Republican13
13 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
33
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-8-4)
senate
Sep 12, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 2457.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 12, 2009
Introduced
Amended.
lower
Sep 12, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on September 11.)
lower
Sep 12, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.)
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on September 9.)
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on U. & C. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Sep 4, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
May 12, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 849.)
upper
Mar 19, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Roderick Wright
Roderick Wright
DDemocratic
CA
35