Property taxation.
Summary
(1) Existing property tax law provides that a remittance to a taxing agency is deemed to be received, if made by an electronic payment, as specified, on the date the transaction was completed by the taxpayer. This bill would require this remittance to be made, in order to be deemed received on the date the transaction was completed by the taxpayer, on the taxing agency's authorized Internet Web site or via the taxing agency's authorized telephone number. (2) Existing law requires a county to return a replicated tax payment to the tendering party within 60 days following the receipt of the replicated payment. If that replicated payment is not returned to the tendering party within 60 days following the receipt of the replicated payment, the county is required to pay interest at a specified rate, for the period beginning 60 days after the county receives the replicated payment to the date the replicated payment is returned to the tendering party. This bill would instead require a county to return a replicated payment to the tendering party within 60 days of the date the payment becomes final. This bill would also require the interest to be computed for the period beginning 60 days after the replicated payment becomes final to the date the replicated payment is returned to the tendering party. (3) Existing law authorizes the board of supervisors, when it is determined that a tax deed to a purchaser of property sold by the tax collector should not have been sold, to rescind the sale with the written consent of the county legal adviser and the purchaser of the property. This bill would authorize the successor in interest of the purchaser of the property to provide written consent to rescind the sale of the property. This bill would authorize the board of supervisors, if the written consent of the purchaser of the property or a successor in interest is not obtained, to rescind the sale of the property, if a hearing is scheduled before the board of supervisors and a notice containing specified information is sent to the purchaser of the property or a successor in interest. This bill would provide that the purchaser or a successor in interest is entitled to a refund of the amount paid as the purchase price plus interest at the county pool apportioned rate, as provided, after rescission of the tax deed is recorded. (4) Existing property tax law authorizes a nonprofit organization, with the approval or permission of either the board of supervisors or that board's designee, to purchase certain property that has been tax defaulted, as specified, and to purchase the property by way of installment payments. Existing law authorizes the tax collector, with the approval of either the board of supervisors or that board's designee, to offer certain property for sale at a minimum price that the tax collector deems appropriate. This bill would eliminate the board designee's authorization to approve the purchase of tax-defaulted property by a nonprofit organization, or to permit the purchase of the property by way of installment payments. This bill would also eliminate the board designee's authorization to approve the tax collector's sale of certain property at a minimum price that the tax collector deems appropriate. (5) Existing law requires the board of supervisors, upon receipt of a specified notice regarding a proposed sale of tax-defaulted property, to either approve or disapprove the proposed sale by resolution, and to transmit a certified copy of the resolution to the tax collector, as specified. This bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change to that provision.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Signed into Law
Jul 2009
Introduced Mar 10, 2009
Signed Jul 2, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2009 · Assembly Jun 22, 2009
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
May 6, 2009
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican15
86% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
6
Committee
3
Jul 2, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Jun 22, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-5)
assembly
Jun 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)
lower
May 6, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-4)
senate
Apr 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 639.)
upper
Mar 10, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 823
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 823. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline