Vehicles: specially constructed vehicles.
Summary
Existing law, upon application for registration of a vehicle previously registered outside this state, requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to grant full faith and credit to the currently valid certificate of title describing the vehicle, the ownership thereof, and the liens thereon, issued by the state in which the vehicle was last registered. Existing law also requires the department to require, upon registration of a motor vehicle previously registered outside this state, a valid certificate of compliance, or a certificate of noncompliance, with California's emission regulations. Existing law additionally requires specially constructed vehicles, depending on various criteria, to be subject to different emission inspection and control requirements based on the engine model-year, the vehicle model-year, or the calendar year in which the application for vehicle registration is submitted. This bill would require a specially constructed vehicle, that was previously registered outside this state, to be assigned the same model-year as the calendar year in which the vehicle was first registered outside this state for purposes of determining emission inspection requirements for the vehicle, except as specified. If the department is unable to establish the year the vehicle was originally registered, the bill would require the department to assign the same model-year as the calendar year in which the application for registration was submitted.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2009 · Assembly Sep 8, 2009
How they voted
24–13
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Jun 1, 2009
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican15
86% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-26)
assembly
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 15.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 6.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 1, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-13-2)
senate
May 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 4, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 30, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 499.)
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 811
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 811. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline