SB 748 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Witness Relocation and Assistance Program: address records.

Summary
Existing law establishes the Witness Relocation and Assistance Program. This bill would provide that no person, state or local public agency, or private entity shall post the home address, the telephone number, or personal identifying information that discloses the location of any witness or witness family member participating in the Witness Relocation and Assistance Program (WRAP) with the intent that another person imminently use that information to commit a crime involving violence or a threat of violence against that witness or witness' family member, and that a violation of these provisions would be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $2,500, or up to 6 months in a county jail, or by both that fine and imprisonment. The bill would also provide that a violation that leads to the bodily injury of the witness, or the witness' family members who are participating in the program, is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $5,000, or up to one year in a county jail, or by both that fine and imprisonment. The bill would authorize participants in the program to submit opt-out forms to Internet search engine providers to notify those providers of the participants, and to prevent inclusion of the participants' addresses and telephone numbers in public Internet search databases, as specified. The bill would require a business, state or local agency, private entity, or person to remove the home address or telephone number of a WRAP participant from its public Internet search databases within two business days of delivery of the opt-out form, and to ensure the information is not reposted on the same Internet Web site, a subsidiary site, or any other Internet Web site maintained by the recipient of the opt-out form, and would subject a violator of this provision to a $5,000 civil fine, as specified. The bill would authorize a witness whose home address or telephone number is made public as a result of a violation, as specified, to bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief. The bill would further provide that no business, state or local agency, private entity, or person that has received an opt-out form from a WRAP participant shall solicit, sell, or trade on the Internet the home address or telephone number of that participant, and would authorize an action for damages, as specified, for a violation of this prohibition. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly Aug 24, 2009

How they voted

36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Aug 31, 2009
D Democratic25
23 Yea 2
92% Yea
R Republican15
13 Yea 2
86% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
37
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-4)
senate
Aug 31, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2022.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 24, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-3)
assembly
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 15.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 28, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 586.)
upper
Apr 14, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 481.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
CA
11