Energy efficiency.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan for each electrical corporation in accordance with specified elements, incentive mechanisms, and objectives. The act requires that an electrical corporation's proposed procurement plan include certain elements, including a showing that the electrical corporation will first meet its unmet needs through all available energy efficiency and demand reduction resources that are cost effective, reliable, and feasible. The act additionally requires the commission, in consultation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, to identify all potentially achievable cost-effective electricity efficiency savings and to establish efficiency targets for electrical corporations to achieve pursuant to their procurement plan. Existing law relative to the restructuring of the electrical services industry requires the commission, in evaluating energy efficiency investments, to ensure that local and regional interests, multifamily dwellings, and energy service industry capabilities are incorporated into an electrical corporation's energy efficiency program portfolio design and that local governments, community-based organizations, and energy efficiency service providers are encouraged to participate in program implementation, where appropriate. This bill would require the commission, in evaluating energy efficiency investments, to ensure that local and regional interests, multifamily dwellings, and energy service industry capabilities are incorporated into an electrical corporation's energy efficiency program portfolio design, and to encourage participation from local governments, community-based organizations, and energy efficiency service providers in program design, revision, and implementation, where appropriate. The bill would require an electrical corporation, when developing or revising its energy efficiency program portfolio design, to collaborate with, and seek comments from, county climate protection authorities or other public agencies that are directly authorized to implement regional or countywide climate protection and energy efficiency programs. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and place additional duties upon electrical corporations, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 25, 2010 · Assembly Aug 18, 2010
How they voted
24–0
Passed · 11 other
Total votes 35
Aug 25, 2010
D
Democratic23
65% Yea
R
Republican12
75% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
41
Key actions
9
Committee
11
Amendments
4
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-0-11)
senate
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 28. Noes 0. Page 4890.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 20, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 4742.)
upper
Aug 19, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4627.) Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Aug 19, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 18, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-4-8)
assembly
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 1, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 28.)
lower
Jul 1, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in Committee on June 17.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on U. & C. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES.
lower
May 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 5. Page 1026.)
upper
May 7, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
upper
May 5, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 755.)
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 730
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 730. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline