Public contracts: public works: competitive bidding: procedures.
Summary
Existing law allows a public agency to elect to be subject to the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, which authorizes bidding procedures for public projects, as specified. The act establishes the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission, which is charged with specified duties, including recommending for adoption by the Controller uniform construction cost accounting procedures for implementation by public agencies in the performance of, or in contracting for, construction on public projects. Under the act, each commission member serves without compensation, but is required to be reimbursed for travel and other expenses incurred, and the commission is authorized to accept grants from federal, state, or local public agencies, or private foundations or individuals, to assist it in carrying out its duties. Existing law requires the commission to review the accounting procedures of any participating public agency upon evidence of an interested party that the work undertaken by the public agency (1) is to be performed by the public agency after rejection of all bids, claiming work can be done less expensively by the public agency; (2) has exceeded the force account limits; or (3) has been improperly classified as maintenance. In any of those circumstances, a request for commission review may be made within 5 business days and the commission is required to commence review immediately and conclude within 30 days from the receipt of the request. This bill would extend the time to 8 business days to request a commission review, to 45 days for a commission review of a public agency project that is to be performed after rejection of all bids, and to 90 days for a commission review of work for which evidence was provided that the work has exceeded the force account limits or has been improperly classified as maintenance.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Jan 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly Aug 16, 2010
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Jan 25, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4657.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-5)
assembly
Jun 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in Committee on June 16.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Jan 25, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-3)
senate
Jan 12, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 11, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 2628.)
upper
Apr 1, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 694
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 694. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline