SB 678 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Criminal recidivism.

Summary
Existing law authorizes the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to oversee programs for the purposes of reducing parolee recidivism. This bill would authorize each county to establish a Community Corrections Performance Incentives Fund (CCPIF) and would authorize the state to annually allocate money into a State Corrections Performance Incentives Fund to be used for specified purposes relating to improving local probation supervision practices and capacities, as specified. This bill would require the Director of Finance, in consultation with the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, the Chief Probation Officers of California, and the Administrative Office of the Courts, to calculate the amount of money to be appropriated from the state fund into a CCPIF. This bill would specify that the calculation would be based on costs avoided by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation because of a reduction in the percentage of adult probationers sent to prison for a probation failure, as specified. This bill would also require each county using CCPIF funds to identify and track specific outcome-based measures, as specified, and report to the Administrative Office of the Courts on the effectiveness of the programs paid for by the CCPIF. This bill would require the community corrections programs to be developed and implemented by the chief probation officer, as advised by a Community Corrections Partnership. This bill would require specified local officials to serve as part of that Community Corrections Partnership. Because this bill would increase the duties for certain local officials, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2009 · Assembly Sep 12, 2009

How they voted

340
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 36
Sep 12, 2009
D Democratic23
21 Yea 2
91% Yea
R Republican13
13 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
37
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2458.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 12, 2009
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, urgency clause adopted, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 19, 2009
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 25, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 16.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.)
lower
May 12, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 849.)
upper
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 706.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 8 co-sponsors

Sponsors