Partnership academies: Clean Technology and Renewable Energy Job Training, Career Technical Education, and Dropout Prevention Program.
Summary
Existing law establishes the partnership academies program as a school-business partnership program to provide occupational training to educationally disadvantaged high school pupils. Under existing law, the Superintendent of Public Instruction is required to award grants to school districts maintaining high schools to plan, establish, and maintain these partnership academies. Existing law requires the surcharge imposed on the consumption of electricity in the state to be transferred to the Energy Resources Programs Account in the General Fund, which is available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for ongoing energy programs and projects. This bill would require the Controller annually to allocate $8,000,000 from the Energy Resources Program Account, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to the Superintendent of Public Instruction for expenditure in the form of local grants to be allocated pursuant to the existing provisions for creating and maintaining partnership academies. The bill would require a grantee to implement or maintain a partnership academy that focuses on employment in clean technology businesses and renewable energy businesses and provides skilled workforces for the products and services for energy or water conservation, or both, renewable energy, pollution reduction, or other technologies. The bill would require the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, in consultation with the State Department of Education, to develop guidelines, that would be exempted from the Administrative Procedure Act, to ensure that programs receiving grants reflect current state energy policies and priorities as well as provide skills and education linked to the needs of relevant industries. The bill would authorize a school district to apply for planning grants for implementing a partnership academy and would allow the Superintendent to expend up to 5% of the funds transferred to the Superintendent to pay the costs incurred in the administration of this program. The bill would require the State Department of Education in consultation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to provide a report to the Legislature that includes a description of the curriculum and substance of the programs funded by grants awarded pursuant to these provisions, and specified data. The bill would provide that the bill's provisions would become inoperative on June 30, 2016, and, as of January 1, 2017, would repeal these provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jan 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly Aug 31, 2010
How they voted
23–8
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Jan 28, 2010
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
49
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
4
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-20-2)
assembly
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 5108.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Aug 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.)
lower
Aug 27, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. On ED. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 28.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in Committee on June 16.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jan 28, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-8-4)
senate
Jan 21, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 2694.)
upper
May 28, 2009
Upper · Passed
Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 28, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 676.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Apr 2, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Apr 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 397.)
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 675
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 675. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline