Agricultural land: valuation.
Summary
Existing law requires the county assessor to assess current fair market valuations to determine the cancellation fee for removing land from a Williamson Act contract. Existing law permits the Department of Conservation or the landowner, if either believes that the current fair market valuations are inaccurate, to request formal review from the county assessor in the county considering the cancellation petition and authorizes the assessor to recover his or her reasonable costs of the formal review from the party requesting the review, as specified. This bill would authorize the assessor to require a deposit from the landowner to cover the contingency that payment of a cancellation fee will not necessarily result from the completion of a formal review, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2009 · Assembly Aug 17, 2009
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
May 14, 2009
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 17, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-3)
assembly
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 15.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 6.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 17, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 17.)
lower
Jun 17, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
May 14, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
May 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 20, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 498.)
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 671
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 671. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline