Sexually violent predators.
Summary
Existing law provides that the Director of Mental Health shall provide each person who is committed as a sexually violent predator with an annual written report which shall include consideration of whether the committed person currently meets the definition of a sexually violent predator and whether conditional or unconditional release is in the best interests of the committed person and the community, as specified. Existing law also provides that if the department determines that the person is no longer a sexually violent predator or conditional release is in the best interests of the person and that conditions can be imposed to adequately protect the community, the director shall authorize the committed person to petition the court for conditional release or unconditional discharge, as specified. Existing law further provides that, upon receipt of a petition for conditional release or unconditional discharge, the court shall hold a show cause hearing to determine that probable cause exists to believe that the person's diagnosed mental disorder has so changed that he or she is not a danger or likely to engage in sexually violent criminal behavior if discharged. If probable cause is found, then the court shall set a hearing on the issue. This bill would require that, at the hearing on the issue of whether the committed person should be conditionally released or unconditionally discharged, where the person's failure to participate in or complete treatment is relied upon as proof that the person's condition has not changed, and there is evidence that supports that reliance, the jury be instructed that the committed person's failure to participate in or complete the State Department of Mental Health Sex Offender Commitment Program may, if proved, be considered evidence that his or her condition has not changed.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Jul 2009
Signed into Law
Aug 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2009 · Assembly Jul 13, 2009
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
May 14, 2009
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
3
Amendments
1
Aug 5, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Jul 13, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-2)
assembly
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 14, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 706.)
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DH
Dennis Hollingsworth
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 669
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 669. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline