SB 662 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Domestic violence: marriage license fees.

Summary
Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance of an authorization for the performance of marriages without a license, in the amount of $23. Existing law requires the additional $23 fee to be collected by the county clerk for deposit into county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. Existing law requires fees collected in the special funds to be disbursed to approved domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet certain requirements on a yearly or more frequent basis. This bill would authorize a county board of supervisors to authorize an increase of the above-described fee from $23 to $33. Existing law provides that proposed or existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements shall receive funding from the county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. This bill would, instead, provide that only existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the requirements shall receive funding. Existing law allows specified local jurisdictions to retain fees received at the time of issuance of a marriage license in excess of the $23 fee. This bill would add Sonoma County as a jurisdiction to whom this provision applies. Existing law requires the money in the special funds to be disbursed using a request for qualification (RFQ) process. This bill would require the RFQ process to involve a determination of whether a domestic violence shelter-based program meets the aforementioned requirements. If a domestic violence shelter-based program meets those requirements, the bill would provide that the program has successfully completed the RFQ process. The bill would provide that an RFQ process shall not be construed to mean a competitive bidding process. Existing law authorizes a county to establish a program for reducing the incidence of domestic violence in the county by establishing or funding domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements. Existing law authorizes geographically adjacent counties to combine their respective domestic violence shelter-based programs funds in order to establish one or more domestic violence shelter-based programs, in order to provide services to the clients of each county that combines its funds with another county. This bill would provide that a county may only fund a domestic violence shelter-based program that is located outside of the county if the funding county is funding all domestic violence shelter-based programs located within its borders that meet the aforementioned requirements and the program located outside of the funding county provides services to residents of the funding county.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009 Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 18, 2009 · Assembly Jun 28, 2010

How they voted

33–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 38
May 18, 2009
D Democratic24
20 Yea 4
83% Yea
R Republican14
13 Yea 1
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
42
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
5
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 26, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 4931.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 9, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 4418.)
upper
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4378.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jul 1, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Jun 28, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-25-3)
assembly
Jun 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
(June 21 amended measure version corrected August 20.)
lower
Jun 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
(June 21 amended measure version corrected August 9.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in Committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.)
lower
May 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on May 13.)
lower
May 13, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Aug 27, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES.
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 18, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-5)
senate
May 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 849.)
upper
Apr 28, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 681.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors

Sponsors