Human trafficking.
Summary
The federal Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 establishes an Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking, as specified. Existing state law makes human trafficking a crime. Existing state law also allows a victim of human trafficking to bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any combination of those, or any other appropriate relief. Existing law generally regulates various business activities and practices, including those of retail sellers and manufacturers of products. This bill would enact the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010, and would, beginning January 1, 2012, require retail sellers and manufacturers doing business in the state to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their direct supply chains for tangible goods offered for sale, as specified. That provision would not apply to a retail seller or manufacturer having less than $100,000,000 in annual worldwide gross receipts. The bill would also make a specified statement of legislative intent regarding slavery and human trafficking. The bill would also require the Franchise Tax Board to make available to the Attorney General a list of retail sellers and manufacturers required to disclose efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking pursuant to that provision, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Jan 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly Aug 26, 2010
How they voted
24–12
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 38
Jan 28, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
6
Committee
3
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 5004.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 26, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-22-8)
assembly
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.)
lower
Jan 28, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-12-2)
senate
May 28, 2009
Upper · Passed
Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 586.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 657
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 657. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline