Freeway construction.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to enter into an agreement prior to any closure of a city street or county highway due to construction of a freeway with a city council or board of supervisors having jurisdiction. Existing law provides an exception to those provisions for a freeway segment within the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, if specified requirements have been met, including that an agreement with one or more counties and cities is not possible because an impasse has existed for 10 or more years after an initial route was adopted. This bill would limit this exception to construction of a segment of a freeway that consists solely of a subsurface transportation facility, as specified. The bill would also require, as a condition for the exception to apply, that an agreement with one or more counties and cities is not possible because an impasse has existed for 20 or more years after an initial route was adopted. Existing law establishes State Highway Route 710 from State Highway Route 1 to State Highway Route 210 in Pasadena. This bill would provide that State Highway Route 710 between Valley Boulevard in the City of Los Angeles and Del Mar Boulevard in the City of Pasadena may not be a surface or above-grade highway.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2009 · Assembly Sep 11, 2009
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
May 26, 2009
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 11, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-7-10)
assembly
Sep 11, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 34. Noes 2. Page 2430.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.)
lower
Aug 19, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 6.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 26, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
May 12, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 848.)
upper
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 708.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
GC
Gilbert Cedillo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 545
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 545. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline