Civil law: omnibus bill.
Summary
(1) The State Bar Act provides that the Board of Governors of the State Bar shall establish, maintain, and administer a system for arbitration and mediation of disputes concerning fees or costs, or both, between attorneys and their clients. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. (2) Existing law provides that certain documents or papers related to oil and gas leases, as provided, that are presented for recordation and set apart and separated from any other writing, typing, or printing, shall not be recorded if that document is preceded by the words or clearly marked "do not record" or "not to be recorded," as specified. This bill would remove this provision and would make nonsubstantive, technical changes to related provisions. (3) Existing law provides that a person or entity that intentionally remotely reads or attempts to remotely read a person's identification document using radio frequency identification (RFID) without his or her knowledge and prior consent, as described, shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for up to one year, a fine of not more than $1,500, or both that fine and imprisonment, except as specified. Existing law also provides that a person or entity that knowingly discloses, or causes to be disclosed, specified operational system keys shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for up to one year, a fine of not more than $1,500, or both that fine and imprisonment. This bill would correct a cross-reference within these provisions. (4) Existing law permits a judgment creditor to apply for an earnings withholding order for a judgment debtor and prescribes a process for this purpose. Existing law requires, as part of this process, that certain items be filed with the levying officer within 5 days after service of the order on the judgment debtor's employer. This bill would provide that the items be filed with the levying officer, as described above, within 5 court days. (5) Existing law authorizes the Judicial Council to establish a tax-exempt public benefit nonprofit corporation, or other tax-exempt entity, qualified under federal and state law to receive grants or other financial support from private or public sources for the purposes of undertaking or funding any survey, study, publication, proceeding, or other activity authorized by law to be undertaken by the Judicial Council. Existing law also authorizes the Administrative Office of the Courts to provide administrative support and oversight services, limited to ministerial support for meetings, and preparing, maintaining, and presenting financial records as needed for audits, to a tax-exempt public benefit nonprofit corporation or other tax-exempt entity established under these provisions, as specified. This bill would authorize the Judicial Council to establish a tax-exempt public benefit nonprofit corporation, or other tax-exempt entity, as provided, for the purpose of undertaking or funding any lawful activity authorized to be undertaken by the Judicial Council. This bill would also remove the limitation on the administrative and support services that can be provided by the Administrative Office of the Courts. (6) Existing law requires a guardian or conservator to present an accounting of the assets of the estate of the ward or conservatee to the court for settlement and allowance in a specified manner at the end of one year from the time of appointment and, after that, not less frequently than once every 2 years, unless otherwise ordered by the court to be more frequent. Existing law requires the guardian or conservator to file specified supporting documents with the accounting. Existing law requires the filing to include all account statements showing the account balance at the beginning of the accounting period and the account balance as of the closing date, as specified. This bill would remove the requirement to show all account statements showing the account balance at the beginning of the accounting period.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Jul 2009
Signed into Law
Aug 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jul 16, 2009 · Assembly Jul 1, 2009
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Jul 16, 2009
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican15
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
3
Committee
3
Amendments
2
Aug 5, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
Jul 16, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-4)
Jul 16, 2009
Senate · Amendment offered
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 1765.) To enrollment.
Jul 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-3)
Jun 25, 2009
Assembly · Reported by committee
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
Jun 25, 2009
Assembly · Amendment adopted
From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)
May 13, 2009
Senate · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 875.)
Apr 13, 2009
Senate · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
Feb 27, 2009
Senate · Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 544
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 544. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline