SB 53 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Tobacco settlement moneys: Master Settlement Agreement.

Summary
Under existing law, states' attorneys general and various tobacco product manufacturers have entered into a Master Settlement Agreement, in settlement of various lawsuits, that provides for the allocation of money to the states and certain territories. The state has entered into a memorandum of understanding providing for the allocation of the state's share of moneys to be received under the Master Settlement Agreement between the state and the various local governments of the state. The Attorney General, on behalf of the state, has entered into the California escrow agreement with the California escrow agent named in the agreement relating to the division between the state and the participating jurisdictions of amounts payable under the Master Settlement Agreement. Existing law sets forth the duties of the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank and its board of directors generally in performing various financing transactions, including the issuance of bonds or the authorizing of the issuance of bonds by a trust, partnership, limited partnership, association, corporation, nonprofit corporation, or other entity, known as a special purpose trust. Under existing law, the bank is authorized to sell for, and on behalf of, the state all or any portion of the state's tobacco assets, as defined, to a special purpose trust consisting of a not-for-profit corporation. This bill would authorize the Attorney General to negotiate amendments to the Master Settlement Agreement, the memorandum of understanding, and the California escrow agreement, provided that those amendments do not materially adversely alter, limit, or impair the rights to receive tobacco assets sold to the special purpose trust, nor in any way materially impair the rights and remedies of bondholders or the security for their bond until those bonds, together with the interest on the bonds and costs and expenses in connection with any action or proceeding on behalf of the bondholders, are fully paid and discharged. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
Apr 2009
Assembly Passage
Jul 2009
Signed into Law
Aug 2009
Introduced Jan 14, 2009 Signed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Apr 16, 2009 · Assembly Jul 9, 2009

How they voted

36–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Apr 16, 2009
D Democratic24
21 Yea 3
87% Yea
R Republican15
15 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Aug 5, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Jul 9, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-5)
assembly
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-3)
senate
Apr 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Mar 24, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 340.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 14, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Mark DeSaulnier
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
CA
7