Career technical education.
Summary
Existing law requires the governing board of each regional occupational center or program, on or before July 1, 2010, to ensure that at least 90% of all state-funded courses offered by the center or program, in occupational areas in which both the program or center and the community college offer instruction, are part of occupational course sequences that target comprehensive skills. Existing law additionally requires, as a condition of receiving federal funds provided under the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act of 1998, and to the extent permitted under federal law, that school districts, regional occupational centers or programs, and community college districts comply with specified requirements relating to the development of course sequences. This bill would additionally require, commencing with the 2012–13 fiscal year, as a condition of receiving federal funds provided under the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act of 1998, and to the extent permitted under federal law, that school districts, regional occupational centers or programs, and community college districts demonstrate that at least one-half of the course sequences offered are linked to high priority workforce needs in the career sectors identified by the Labor and Workforce Development Agency or the Labor Market Information Division of the Employment Development Department for the state of California, for the economic region established by the state where the regional occupational center or program, community college district, or school district is located, or for the county where the regional occupational center or program, community college district, or school district is located. The bill would encourage school districts, regional occupational centers or programs, and community college districts to work with local workforce investment boards and the Labor Market Information Division of the Employment Development Department in the identification of career sectors of high priority.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Vetoed Sep 24, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2009 · Assembly Aug 25, 2010
How they voted
27–9
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 38
May 14, 2009
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican14
64% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
6
Committee
3
Amendments
2
Sep 24, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 23, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 26, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 31. Noes 6. Page 4923.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (50-17-1)
assembly
Sep 3, 2009
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 17.)
lower
Jun 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)
lower
May 14, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-9-2)
senate
May 11, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 1. Page 838.)
upper
Apr 22, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 608.) Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 515
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 515. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline