State General Obligation Bond Law: audits.
Summary
The State General Obligation Bond Law sets forth the procedures for the issuance and sale of bonds governed by its provisions and for the disbursal of the proceeds of the sale of those bonds. Existing law provides for various oversight and reporting requirements for the expenditure of state funds, including the proceeds of bonds. This bill would require the Controller to select one or more projects funded by any state general obligation bond act approved on or after January 1, 2010, to be the subject of an audit to be conducted as specified. The Controller would be required annually to assign up to 5 auditor positions to conduct these audits. The Controller would be authorized to examine any record of any agency, contractor, and other specified parties that relates to the use of bond proceeds and would be required, by April 30 of each year, to prepare an audit plan for the following fiscal year. The bill would require an entity that is to be audited, prior to contracting with the Controller for an audit, to determine that it is able to pay the estimated cost of conducting the audit from the proceeds of bonds for administrative purposes for that project. The bill would prohibit the Controller from conducting the audit if those proceeds are not available.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jan 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly Aug 19, 2010
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 38
Jan 28, 2010
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4883.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 19, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-2)
assembly
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 12.)
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 28, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-2)
senate
Jan 21, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 2694.)
upper
May 28, 2009
Upper · Passed
Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 28, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 4. Page 681.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CK
Christine Kehoe
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 503
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 503. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline