Prescriptions.
Summary
Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of pharmacists by the California State Board of Pharmacy and provides that a knowing violation of the law is a crime. Existing law requires a prescription, as defined, to include a legible, clear notice of the condition for which the drug is prescribed, if requested by the patient. Existing law prohibits a pharmacist from dispensing any prescription unless it is in a specified container that is correctly labeled to include, among other information, the condition for which the drug was prescribed if requested by the patient and the condition is indicated on the prescription. This bill would instead require that every prescription include a legible, clear notice of the condition or purpose for which the drug is prescribed, if requested by the patient. The bill would also require that every prescription container be correctly labeled to include that information if so indicated on the prescription. By revising these requirements, the knowing violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2009 · Assembly Aug 27, 2009
How they voted
36–1
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 38
May 14, 2009
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-5)
assembly
Jul 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on B. & P. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
May 14, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-1-1)
senate
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 27, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 580.)
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ellen Corbett
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 470
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 470. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline