SB 427 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Automotive repair: crash parts.

Summary
Existing law, the Automotive Repair Act, establishes the Bureau of Automotive Repair under the supervision and control of the Director of Consumer Affairs. The act provides for the registration and regulation of automotive repair dealers and authorizes the director to adopt regulations to implement its provisions. The act requires all work done by an automotive repair dealer to be recorded on an invoice that describes all service work done and parts supplied. The act requires the invoice to include a statement indicating whether any crash parts are original equipment manufacturer crash parts or nonoriginal equipment manufacturer aftermarket crash parts. The act also requires this information to be provided to a customer in an itemized written estimate when an automotive repair dealer is doing auto body or collision repairs. Existing law requires the automotive repair dealer to obtain authorization from the customer before performing work and imposing charges. A violation of the act is a crime. Existing law governing motor vehicle replacement parts prohibits an insurer from requiring the use of specified parts in the repair of an insured's motor vehicle unless certain requirements have been met. This bill would define and redefine "crash part," "aftermarket crash part," and "original equipment manufacturer crash part," for purposes of the act and the motor vehicle replacement part provisions. The bill would specify that an automotive repair dealer who prepares a written estimate that includes replacement of a deployed airbag and who fails to repair and fully restore the airbag where the consumer has paid for the repair, as specified, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, imprisonment, or both. The bill would require the invoice for work done by an automotive repair dealer to describe all service work done, parts supplied, and crash parts installed. The bill would make a statement of legislative intent regarding this requirement. Because a violation of some of the bill's provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 26, 2009 Vetoed Sep 24, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2009 · Assembly Aug 30, 2010

How they voted

239
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Jun 3, 2009
D Democratic22
21 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican13
2 Yea 9 Nay 2
69% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
42
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Sep 24, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 23, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (51-7-2)
assembly
Aug 30, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 5035.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-9-3)
senate
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 27, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 580.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 807.) Reconsideration granted.
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.