SB 424 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Vehicles: manufacturers and distributors.

Summary
(1) Existing law makes it a violation of the Vehicle Code for the holder of a vehicle dealer's license to commit specified actions, including, among other things, to advertise for sale, sell, or purchase for resale a new vehicle of a line-make for which the dealer does not hold a franchise. Existing law also lists various exceptions to this requirement. This bill would expand the list of existing exceptions to also include a vehicle acquired in the ordinary course of business as a new vehicle by a dealer franchised to sell that vehicle if specified conditions are met, including if the manufacturer or distributor of the vehicle files a bankruptcy petition. (2) Existing law generally requires a manufacturer, manufacturer branch, remanufacturer, remanufacturer branch, distributor, distributor branch, transporter, or dealer of vehicles to be licensed by the Department of Motor Vehicles. Under existing law, it is unlawful for a manufacturer, manufacturer branch, distributor, or distributor branch to, among other things, dishonor a warranty, rebate, or other incentive offered to the public or a dealer, as specified, or to unfairly discriminate in favor of a dealership owned or controlled, in whole or part, by a manufacturer or an entity that controls or is controlled by a manufacturer or distributor. This bill would prohibit a manufacturer, manufacturer branch, distributor, or distributor branch from preventing, or attempting to prevent, by contract or otherwise, a dealer from acquiring, adding, or maintaining a sales or service operation for another line-make of motor vehicles at the same or expanded facility at which the dealer currently operates a dealership if the dealer complies with any reasonable facilities and capital requirements of the manufacturer or distributor or from requiring a dealer to establish or maintain exclusive facilities, personnel, or display space if the imposition of the requirement would be unreasonable in light of all existing circumstances, including economic conditions. In any proceeding under these provisions in which the reasonableness of a facility requirement is an issue, the manufacturer or distributor would have the burden of proof. The bill would also prohibit additional specified unlawful acts by a manufacturer, manufacturer branch, distributor, or distributor branch against a dealer. (3) Under existing law, a violation of the above provisions relating to occupational licensing and business regulations in the Vehicle Code is a misdemeanor. Because this bill would create a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Signed into Law
Jul 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009 Signed Jul 2, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 22, 2009 · Assembly Jun 18, 2009

How they voted

37–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Jun 22, 2009
D Democratic25
23 Yea 2
92% Yea
R Republican14
14 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
30
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Jul 2, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Jun 22, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (37-0-2)
senate
Jun 22, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1373.) To enrollment.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-5)
assembly
Jun 11, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 11.)
lower
Jun 11, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.)
lower
May 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on May 21.)
lower
May 21, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 15, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 499.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors

Sponsors