Body armor.
Summary
Existing law provides that any person who has been convicted of a violent felony who purchases, owns, or possesses body armor, as defined in the California Code of Regulations, except as authorized, is guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in a state prison for 16 months or 2 or 3 years. However, the court, in People v. Saleem (102 Cal.Rptr.3d 652) , held that this provision is unconstitutionally vague in violation of due process. This bill would change the definition of "body armor" for purposes of this provision to mean any bullet-resistant material intended to provide ballistic and trauma protection for the person wearing the body armor. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
May 2010
Senate Passage
Jan 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Signed into Law
Jun 2010
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Signed Jun 2, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly May 17, 2010
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Jan 28, 2010
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Jun 2, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
May 17, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (56-0-5)
assembly
May 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on May 5.)
lower
May 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on April 22.)
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 28, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Jan 25, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 2694.)
upper
Jan 19, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 2688.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 14, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jan 14, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Alex Padilla
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Huff
RRepublican
Co
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Co
Dave Cox
RRepublican
Co
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Co
JW
Jared William Huffman
DDemocratic
Co
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Co
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Co
PJ
Paul J Cook
RRepublican
Co
PN
Pedro Nava
DDemocratic
Co
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 408
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 408. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline