SB 388 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

South Coast Air Quality Management District: emission reduction credits: California Environmental Quality Act.

Summary
(1) Under existing law, every air pollution control district or air quality management district in a federal nonattainment area for any national ambient air quality standard is required to establish by regulation, a system by which all reductions in emissions of air contaminants that are to be used to offset certain future increases in the emission of air contaminants are banked prior to use. The South Coast Air Quality Management District promulgated various rules establishing offset exemptions, providing Priority Reserve offset credits, and creating or tracking credits used for offset exemption or Priority Reserve projects. In Natural Resources Defense Council v. South Coast Air Quality Management District (Super. Ct. Los Angeles County, 2007, No. BS 110792) , the superior court found the promulgation of certain of these district rules to be in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . This bill would require the executive officer of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, upon making a specified finding, to transfer emission reduction credits for certain pollutants from the south coast district's internal emission credit accounts to eligible electrical generating facilities, as described. The bill would exempt those actions from CEQA. By imposing these duties on the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. These provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2013. (2) This bill would state the findings and declarations of the Legislature concerning the need for special legislation. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Sep 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2009 Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2009 · Assembly Sep 12, 2009

How they voted

275
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
May 14, 2009
D Democratic22
19 Yea 1 Nay 2
86% Yea
R Republican13
8 Yea 4 Nay 1
61% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
42
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 12, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-14-11)
assembly
Sep 12, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 12, 2009
Introduced
Amended.
lower
Sep 12, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on September 11.)
lower
Sep 12, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.)
lower
Sep 4, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. On U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Jul 14, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 7.)
lower
Jul 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.)
lower
May 14, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-5-3)
senate
May 6, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 807.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on ED. and JUD.
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.