Ballots: identifying information.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a voter from placing any mark upon a ballot that will make the ballot identifiable. Under existing law, a ballot that is not marked as provided by law or that is marked or signed by the voter so that the ballot can be identified by others is required to be rejected. If a ballot is marked in a manner so as to identify the voter, the ballot is required to be marked "Void" and placed in a container for void ballots. This bill would instead prohibit a voter from placing personal information, as defined, upon a ballot that identifies the voter. The bill would provide that a ballot that contains personal information is not invalid. The bill would delete the requirement that a ballot marked in a manner so as to identify the voter is void and instead require a ballot that contains personal information to be segregated in a specified manner and would require that a duplicate ballot be prepared. By changing the duties of local elections officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Jul 2009
Vetoed
Aug 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Vetoed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2009 · Assembly Jul 13, 2009
How they voted
25–12
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
May 14, 2009
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican15
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Aug 6, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Aug 5, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-21-5)
assembly
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 14, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-12-2)
senate
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 582.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 25, 2009
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 387
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 387. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline