Health facilities: direct care nurses.
Summary
Under existing law, the Department of Consumer Affairs, Board of Registered Nursing regulates the licensing of registered nurses. Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to license and regulate health facilities, including hospitals, and establish minimum hospital nurse-to-patient ratios by licensed nurse classification and by hospital unit. Under existing law, specified hospitals are required to adopt written policies and procedures for training and orientation of nursing staff. These provisions prohibit a registered nurse from being assigned to a nursing unit or clinical area until that nurse has received the specified orientation and demonstrated sufficient competency. A violation of these health facility provisions is a crime. This bill would require each new direct care registered nursing hire to receive and complete an orientation to the hospital and patient care unit in which he or she will be working. It would preclude a nurse who has not completed this orientation from being assigned direct patient care, and would require observation of the nurse during the orientation by a direct care registered nurse. This bill would specify that, until the nurse completes orientation, he or she would not be counted as staff in computing the nurse-to-patient ratio. This bill would exempt a state inpatient mental health hospital, a state developmental center, or a state veterans' home from those provisions of the bill requiring observation of the nurse during the orientation. Existing law allows the State Department of Public Health to take into consideration the unique nature of the University of California teaching hospitals and requires the department to coordinate with the Board of Registered Nursing in setting the nurse-to-patient ratios, as specified. This bill would remove those provisions. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Last action Feb 1, 2010
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
2
Committee
2
Amendments
1
May 28, 2009
Upper · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 22, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 4. Page 556.)
upper
Feb 25, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Leland Yee
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 360
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 360. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline