Local government: assessments: election requirements.
Summary
(1) Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution generally require that assessments, fees, and charges be submitted to property owners for approval or rejection after the provision of written notice and the holding of a public hearing. Existing law, the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, prescribes specific procedures and parameters for local jurisdictions to comply with Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. Existing statutory law provides notice, protest, and hearing procedures for the levying of new or increased assessments, fees, and charges by local government agencies pursuant to Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. This bill would prescribe other requirements relating to the ballot envelope, the tabulation of ballots, and the preservation of ballots to the public as disclosable public records. By creating new requirements for property assessments conducted by counties and cities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly Aug 27, 2009
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 36
Sep 2, 2009
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-1)
senate
Sep 2, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2130.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 27, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-0-4)
assembly
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 7.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on E. & R. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
May 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 4, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 703.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 25, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JJ
John J Benoit
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 321
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 321. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline