Jury service.
Summary
Under existing law, a prospective trial juror who has been summoned for jury service and fails to attend as directed or respond to the court may be compelled to attend, as specified. In addition, after an order to show cause hearing, the court may find the prospective juror in contempt of court, which is punishable by fine, incarceration, or both. Until January 1, 2010, existing law permits the court, in lieu of imposing penalties for contempt, to impose reasonable monetary sanctions of no more than $250 for a first violation, $750 for a 2nd violation, and $1,500 for the 3rd and any subsequent violation, upon a prospective juror who has failed to respond and who has not been excused, after first providing the prospective juror with notice and an opportunity to be heard, as specified. This bill would require the 2nd summons to be issued no earlier than 90 days after the initial failure to appear. This bill would also extend the above provisions indefinitely by deleting the January 1, 2010, termination date.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Apr 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Signed into Law
Aug 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Signed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Apr 27, 2009 · Assembly Jun 30, 2009
How they voted
38–0
Passed
Total votes 38
Apr 27, 2009
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican14
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
6
Committee
3
Amendments
1
Aug 5, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Jun 30, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-2)
assembly
Jun 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0)
senate
Apr 21, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 586.)
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 25, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TH
Tom Harman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 319
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 319. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline