Professional fiduciaries: donative transfers.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Professional Fiduciaries Act, defines professional fiduciaries required to be licensed by the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau within the Department of Consumer Affairs as a person who acts as a conservator or guardian for 2 or more persons who are related to the professional fiduciary or each other, or a person who acts as a trustee or agent under a durable power of attorney for more than 3 people or families who are not related to the professional fiduciary. This bill would specify how individuals are counted to determine whether a person is a professional fiduciary, including that individuals related to the fiduciary would not be counted and individuals or trustors who are related to each other would be counted as one individual. (2) Existing law, effective January 1, 2010, in relation to wills, trusts, and other instruments, defines and regulates no contest clauses. Existing law limits the application of a no contest clause to specific contests and provides that a no contest clause may be enforced against a direct contest only when it is brought without probable cause. Former law exempted certain contests from the enforcement of the no contest clause under specified circumstances, including if there was reasonable cause to believe that instrument had been revoked. Former law also permitted a beneficiary to apply to a court for a determination of whether a particular motion, petition, or other act by the beneficiary would be a contest within the terms of a no contest clause. This bill would make conforming changes to clarify under what circumstances the former law would apply. (3) Existing law provides for a decedent's property to be distributed through intestate succession when the decedent dies without a will, trust, or other instrument based on the degree of kinship. Existing law prohibits certain property transactions between certain court officials or employees or their relatives and guardians or conservators based on the lineal or collateral consanguinity of the person to the court official or employee. Existing law requires a guardian or conservator, when engaging in certain property transactions, or when seeking approval for certain acts, with the guardians or conservator's family members, based on lineal or collateral consanguinity, to disclose that relationship to the court upon a petition for approval. This bill would define the degree of kinship or consanguinity for the purpose of these provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
Apr 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2009 · Assembly Aug 17, 2009
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Aug 24, 2009
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican14
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
Aug 24, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1924.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-3)
assembly
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 15.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on B. & P. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 383.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 25, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TH
Tom Harman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 308
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 308. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline