Nursing facility residents: informed consent.
Summary
Existing law provides that patients of skilled nursing facilities and intermediate care facilities have prescribed rights. This bill would add to these rights the right of every resident to receive all information that is material to an individual's decision concerning whether to accept or refuse any proposed treatment or procedure. This bill would make the physician responsible for disclosing the material information to the resident and obtaining his or her informed consent. This bill would require that informed consent, as defined, be obtained in accordance with the above requirements of the bill, with respect to a resident's decision to accept or reject the administration of a psychotherapeutic drug. This bill would also require the State Department of Public Health to inspect for compliance with this requirement during prescribed inspections. Under existing law, the Long-Term Care, Health, Safety, and Security Act of 1973, an attending physician and surgeon who seeks to prescribe, order, or increase an order for an antipsychotic medication for a resident of a skilled nursing facility is required to obtain the informed consent of that resident. A violation of this provision is a misdemeanor. This bill would extend these requirements to a physician and surgeon of a resident in an intermediate care facility. This bill would apply the definition of "informed consent" contained in the bill to this provision. Because this bill would change the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly Sep 8, 2009
How they voted
23–11
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Jun 2, 2009
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
44
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
7
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 13. Page 2372.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (37-21-3)
assembly
Sep 2, 2009
Introduced
Amendments by Assembly Member Knight tabled on motion by Assembly Member Torrico. (Ayes 48. Noes 28. Page 2896.)
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Introduced
Amendments by Assembly Member Anderson tabled on motion by Assembly Member Krekorian. (Ayes 47. Noes 28. Page 2896.)
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Introduced
Amendments by Assembly Member Logue tabled on motion by Assembly Member Krekorian. (Ayes 48. Noes 28. Page 2895.)
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Introduced
Amendments by Assembly Member Gaines tabled on motion by Assembly Member Krekorian. (Ayes 48. Noes 28. Page 2894.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 2, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-11-1)
senate
May 28, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 5. Page 1069.)
upper
May 11, 2009
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 701.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 14, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 3. Page 421.)
upper
Feb 25, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
EA
Elaine Alquist
DDemocratic
Co
DF
Dean Florez
DDemocratic
Co
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Co
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 303
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 303. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline