SB 268 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Correctional facilities: wireless communication devices.

Summary
Existing law establishes various offenses relating to the unauthorized provision of specified items to persons confined in local and state correctional facilities. This bill would provide, subject to exceptions, that any inmate or ward who possesses any cellular telephone or other wireless communication device or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, a subscriber identity module (SIM card) or memory storage device, or any person who possesses with the intent to deliver, or delivers, to an inmate or ward in the custody of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation any cellular telephone or other wireless communication device or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, a SIM card or memory storage device, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000. The bill would also provide that if a person visiting an inmate or ward is found to be in possession of a cellular telephone or other wireless communication device or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, a SIM card or memory storage device, when searched or subjected to a metal detector, as specified, that cellular telephone or wireless communication device or component shall be subject to confiscation. The bill would require posted notices regarding those search and confiscation provisions, as specified. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2009 Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2009

How they voted

2215
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 38
Jun 3, 2009
D Democratic24
8 Yea 15 Nay 1
62% Nay
R Republican14
14 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Jun 10, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 10.)
lower
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 2, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES.
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
lower
Jun 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-15-1)
senate
May 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 6, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 5, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 4. Page 729.)
upper
Feb 24, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TH
Tom Harman
RRepublican
CA
35