SB 220 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Health care coverage: preventive health services: tobacco cessation.

Summary
Existing law, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) , enacts various health care coverage market reforms. With respect to plan years beginning on and after September 23, 2010, the act requires health insurance issuers to provide coverage, and not impose cost-sharing requirements, for certain preventive health services. PPACA also requires each state to, by January 1, 2014, establish an American Health Benefit Exchange that facilitates the purchase of qualified health plans by qualified individuals and qualified small employers, as specified. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law requests the University of California to establish the California Health Benefits Review Program to assess legislation proposing to mandate a benefit or service and legislation proposing to repeal a mandated benefit or service, as specified. This bill would require certain health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies issued, amended, renewed, or delivered on or after September 23, 2010, to provide coverage, and not impose cost-sharing requirements, for certain preventive health services consistent with federal law. The bill would also require certain health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies issued, amended, renewed, or delivered on or after January 1, 2011, to provide coverage for tobacco cessation treatment that includes specified courses of treatment and medication. The bill would request the University of California, as part of the California Health Benefits Review Program, to prepare a report regarding any state savings as a result of this coverage requirement. The bill would make the coverage requirement inoperative upon a determination that it will result in the state assuming additional costs, as specified. Because a willful violation of the bill's provisions relative to health care service plans would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 23, 2009 Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 11, 2009 · Assembly Aug 30, 2010

How they voted

2013
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 11, 2009
D Democratic22
20 Yea 2
90% Yea
R Republican13
13 Nay
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
55
Key actions
14
Committee
17
Amendments
5
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 13. Page 5087.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 5130.)
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 5056.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-20)
assembly
Aug 30, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 25.)
lower
Aug 25, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 2.)
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. On HEALTH pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 24, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 5.)
lower
May 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on May 6.)
lower
May 6, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. On RULES pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 15.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.)
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.)
lower
May 11, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-13-2)
senate
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 586.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 23, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors