Education finance: federal tax credit bond volume cap.
Summary
Existing federal law authorizes the Internal Revenue Service to publish the maximum face value amount of qualified school construction bonds, as defined, that may be allocated by the United States Department of the Treasury to each state pursuant to the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. This bill would assign specified amounts of the state's 2009 federal tax credit bond volume cap to the State Department of Education and the California School Finance Authority, to be assigned and distributed to school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools, as specified. The bill would exempt the assignment and distribution of the federal tax credit bond volume cap under the bill from the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Mar 2010
Senate Passage
Mar 2010
Assembly Passage
Mar 2010
Signed into Law
Mar 2010
Introduced Feb 23, 2009
Signed Mar 25, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Mar 22, 2010 · Assembly Mar 11, 2010
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Mar 22, 2010
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
43
Key actions
13
Committee
12
Amendments
4
Mar 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Mar 22, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2981.) To enrollment.
upper
Mar 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
Urgency clause adopted.
upper
Mar 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 2953.)
upper
Mar 15, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on APPR pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2945.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 15, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Mar 11, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (56-0-5)
assembly
Feb 25, 2010
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, the urgency clause was adopted, and the bill was passed and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Jan 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on January 21.)
lower
Jan 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 19, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 13, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 4. Page 655.)
upper
Apr 14, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 4. Page 398.)
upper
Feb 23, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 205
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 205. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline