Class size reduction: Long Beach Unified School District.
Summary
Existing law allows a school district that maintains kindergarten or grades 1 to 3, inclusive, to apply to the Superintendent of Public Instruction for an apportionment to implement a K–3 Class Size Reduction Program. The purpose of the program is to ensure that instruction is received in classrooms where there are not more than 20 pupils. The Controller is required to deduct an amount equal to the amount received by the school district for class size reduction from the district's next principal apportionment or apportionments of state funds if the district does not implement its class size reduction program for all grades and classes for which it received funding. This bill would authorize the Superintendent to approve funding for the Long Beach Unified School District for the 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12 school years for a class size reduction program if the class size exceeds 20 pupils, or the class is housed with another class, and specified criteria are met, including criteria relating to closures on Catalina Island resulting from the May 2007 fire and resultant debris flow hazard due to weather-related conditions. These provisions would become inoperative on July 1, 2012, and would be repealed on January 1, 2013. This bill would state the findings and declarations of the Legislature concerning the need for special legislation.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 23, 2009
Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2009 · Assembly Sep 11, 2009
How they voted
36–0
Passed
Total votes 36
Sep 9, 2009
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
50
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
5
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 11, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-1)
assembly
Sep 11, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2429.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 10, 2009
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, urgency clause adopted, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Sep 9, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0)
senate
Sep 9, 2009
Introduced
Senate refuses to concur in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 25. Noes 1. Page 2345.)
upper
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 19, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 14, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.)
lower
May 28, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 1068.)
upper
May 6, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 5, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 725.)
upper
Feb 23, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 193
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 193. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline