Vehicles: child passengers.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes rules of the road governing the operation of vehicles upon the highways, including, among other things, a mandatory seat belt law. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would delete related legislative findings and declarations and make other conforming changes in existing law. (2) Existing law prohibits a parent or legal guardian, while present in a motor vehicle, from permitting his or her child or ward to be transported upon a highway in the vehicle without properly securing the child or ward in a rear seat in a child passenger restraint system meeting applicable federal safety standards, unless the child or ward is 6 years of age or older or weighs 60 pounds or more. Existing law imposes a similar prohibition on the driver of a vehicle, unless the parent or legal guardian of the child is also present in the vehicle and is not the driver. Existing law permits a child or ward under the age of 6 years who weighs less than 60 pounds to ride in the front seat of a motor vehicle if the child is properly secured in a child passenger restraint system that meets applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards, under specified circumstances, including, but not limited to, if all rear seats are already occupied by children under the age of 12 years. This bill would, for purposes of allowing certain children to sit in the front seat under this exception, lower the age of the children occupying the rear seats from 12 to 8 years of age. Because this bill would change the definition of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The bill would also make various nonsubstantive technical and conforming changes. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Apr 2009
Senate Passage
Apr 2009
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Apr 23, 2009
How they voted
25–11
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Apr 23, 2009
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican15
73% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
2
Committee
2
Apr 23, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-11-3)
senate
Apr 20, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 1, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 4. Page 398.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 17, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 177
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 177. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline