Food safety: testing and recalls.
Summary
Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, authorizes, for purposes of enforcement of the law, an authorized agent of the State Department of Public Health to, among other things, enter any factory, warehouse, or establishment in which any food is manufactured, packed, or held, enter any vehicle that is being used to transport or hold the food, and inspect any factory, warehouse, establishment, vehicle, or place, and all pertinent equipment, raw material, finished and unfinished materials, containers, and labeling in the factory, warehouse, establishment, vehicle, or place. Existing law authorizes the agent to secure any sample or specimen of any food, as specified. It is unlawful for any person to refuse to permit entry or inspection, the taking of samples or other evidence, or access to copying of any record as authorized by this part, or to conceal the samples or evidence, or withhold evidence concerning them. A violation of the law is a misdemeanor. This bill would authorize the State Public Health Officer to adopt regulations regarding the voluntary recall of food that, without intervention, could transmit an illness that could kill or seriously affect the health of humans, as specified.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 14, 2009
Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2009 · Assembly Sep 1, 2009
How they voted
23–11
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Jun 3, 2009
D
Democratic22
90% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
39
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 4, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 26. Noes 9. Page 2217.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (37-23-1)
assembly
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.)
lower
Jul 6, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on AGRI. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Jun 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-11-1)
senate
Jun 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 5. Page 1068.)
upper
May 11, 2009
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 6, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 5, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 729.)
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 582.) Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 14, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DF
Dean Florez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 173
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 173. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline