Electricity: smart grid systems.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. Under existing law, the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility, as defined, generally has authority over the activities of the utility. This bill would require the commission, by July 1, 2010, and in consultation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , the Independent System Operator (ISO) , and other key stakeholders, to determine the requirements for a smart grid deployment plan consistent with the policies set forth in the bill and federal law. The bill would require that the smart grid improve overall efficiency, reliability, and cost-effectiveness of electrical system operations, planning, and maintenance. The bill would require each electrical corporation, by July 1, 2011, to develop and submit a smart grid deployment plan to the commission for approval. The bill would authorize a smart grid deployment plan that is adopted to provide for deployment of smart grid products, technologies, and services by entities other than electrical corporations. The bill would authorize smart grid technologies to be deployed in an incremental manner to maximize the benefit to ratepayers and to achieve the benefits of smart grid technology, would authorize the commission to modify or adjust the bill's requirements for an electrical corporation with fewer than 100,000 service connections as individual circumstances merit, and would require the commission, in consultation with the Energy Commission, the ISO, and electrical corporations, at each step of deployment, to evaluate the impact of deployment on major initiatives and policies. The bill would require the commission to report, by January 1, 2011, and by January 1 of each year thereafter, to the Governor and the Legislature on the commission's recommendations for a smart grid, the plans and deployment of smart grid technologies by the state's electrical corporations, and the costs and benefits to ratepayers. The bill would require a local publicly owned electric utility, as defined, to develop by July 1, 2011, a smart grid deployment plan consistent with the policies set forth in federal law. By placing requirements upon local publicly owned electric utilities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Dec 1, 2008
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2009 · Assembly Sep 1, 2009
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Jun 1, 2009
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 4, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2201.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-1)
assembly
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 1, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
May 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 1025.)
upper
May 5, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 699.)
upper
Dec 1, 2008
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 17
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 17. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline