Health care coverage: cervical cancer screening: human papillomavirus vaccination.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox‑Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Under existing law, health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies that include coverage for the treatment or surgery of cervical cancer are deemed to provide coverage for an annual cervical cancer screening test, upon the referral of the patient's physician and surgeon, nurse practitioner, or certified nurse midwife, as specified. This bill would make those provisions apply if the referral is made by a physician assistant, as specified. In addition, the bill would require those plan contracts and insurance policies to provide coverage for a human papillomavirus vaccination, as specified. Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 12, 2009
Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 11, 2009 · Assembly Sep 2, 2009
How they voted
22–11
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 11, 2009
D
Democratic22
90% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 25. Noes 14. Page 2289.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-20-6)
assembly
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 17, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 9.)
lower
Jun 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.)
lower
May 11, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-11-2)
senate
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 8. Noes 3. Page 636.) Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 12, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
PW
Patricia Wiggins
DDemocratic
Co
JW
Jared William Huffman
DDemocratic
Co
NE
Noreen Evans
DDemocratic
Co
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 158
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 158. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline